Bioethics Discussion Blog: "Erst kommt das Fressen, dann kommt die Moral"--first comes a full stomach, then comes ethics

REMINDER: I AM POSTING A NEW TOPIC ABOUT ONCE A WEEK OR PERHAPS TWICE A WEEK. HOWEVER, IF YOU DON'T FIND A NEW TOPIC POSTED, THERE ARE AS OF MARCH 2013 OVER 900 TOPIC THREADS TO WHICH YOU CAN READ AND WRITE COMMENTS. I WILL BE AWARE OF EACH COMMENTARY AND MAY COME BACK WITH A REPLY.

TO FIND A TOPIC OF INTEREST TO YOU ON THIS BLOG, SIMPLY TYPE IN THE NAME OR WORDS RELATED TO THE TOPIC IN THE FIELD IN THE LEFT HAND SIDE AT TOP OF THE PAGE AND THEN CLICK ON “SEARCH BLOG”. WITH WELL OVER 900 TOPICS, MOST ABOUT GENERAL OR SPECIFIC ETHICAL ISSUES BUT NOT NECESSARILY RELATED TO ANY SPECIFIC DATE OR EVENT, YOU SHOULD BE ABLE TO FIND WHAT YOU WANT. IF YOU DON’T PLEASE WRITE TO ME ON THE FEEDBACK THREAD OR BY E-MAIL DoktorMo@aol.com

IMPORTANT REQUEST TO ALL WHO COMMENT ON THIS BLOG: ALL COMMENTERS WHO WISH TO SIGN ON AS ANONYMOUS NEVERTHELESS PLEASE SIGN OFF AT THE END OF YOUR COMMENTS WITH A CONSISTENT PSEUDONYM NAME OR SOME INITIALS TO HELP MAINTAIN CONTINUITY AND NOT REQUIRE RESPONDERS TO LOOK UP THE DATE AND TIME OF THE POSTING TO DEFINE WHICH ANONYMOUS SAID WHAT. Thanks. ..Maurice

FEEDBACK,FEEDBACK,FEEDBACK! WRITE YOUR FEEDBACK ABOUT THIS BLOG, WHAT IS GOOD, POOR AND CONSTRUCTIVE SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT TO THIS FEEDBACK THREAD

Wednesday, November 30, 2005

"Erst kommt das Fressen, dann kommt die Moral"--first comes a full stomach, then comes ethics

With the first partial face transplant carried out in France, there is much in the news about this event and the ethics involved. I am not sure, if face transplants are to be carried out only to rehabilitate the injured or diseased faces, that there is much ethical debate necessary. The main ethical requirement, as with other surgery and experimental procedures, is that the patient be fully informed as to the risks and expected outcome before patient consent is given. It is doubtful that any total face transplant will result in the same face and facial expressions that were present on the donor.

There is another issue, however, which this news has brought out. That issue is regarding the work of the professional ethicists with regard to investigating societal issues in ethical terms and if these issues are found ethically wanting then to publicize the problem and suggest ethical remediation. To some, it appears that bioethicists have, in recent decades, seemingly devoted their time and energy to what has been considered as minor ethical issues when greater ethical issues loom in the United States and throughout the world.

One such critic of current bioethical concerns is Dr Erich H. Loewy,
Professor of Medicine (emeritus), Founding Alumni Association Chair of Bioethics, Associate of Philosophy, University of California, Davis. He has repeatedly argued in favor of ethicists dealing with those bigger issues.
He wrote the following comments to a bioethics listserv today and I have obtained permission from him to reproduce his comments here below. As you read in the newspapers and watch on TV what ethical issues are discussed by the ethics consultants, do you think that there is merit to Dr. Loewy’s concerns? ..Maurice.



I do not--from a technical point of view--know enough about facial transplant to say anything worthwhile. If the technique works well, then accident, burn, etc. victims
most certainly be allowed to benefit from this just like a man with an accidentally amputated limb should have a prosthesis. My fear is that now this will become another plastic surgery device for the rich and well-born like liposuction, etc. It is interesting that on the German discussion list we have for two weeks discussed what is called BID (body image distortion) and doing amputations of perfectly healthy limbs because the person allegedly feels that their body image requires such a reputation. My own feeling is that this is probably a psychiatric problem, that the patient belongs under psychiatric care and above all whether such an amputation actually heals or whether three weeks later they must have some other part chopped off. Then, of course, they are entitled to support for the disabled, etc., etc. should this be called the "Van Gogh Syndrome?" It is remarkable that anorexia nervosa or bulimia is rare in the Ghetto.

In a time and age where poverty throughout the world is widespread, where going without basic health care (either in the US in the uninsured) or in the developing world because basic things are lacking we should really waste our time discussing these "far out" problems rather than concentrating our energy on filling empty stomachs, giving to all access to basic health care and education, etc. I feel that we spend far too much time on "rich man's ethics" (partly because that's were the power is) and far too little on innovative ways of bringing good basic health care and eliminating crass poverty for all.

Ms. Blare--who works on an $ 8.50 job, has not enough to feed her child (this is beneath the poverty line), has no time to be trained for a better job and has no time to do so seems a more worthy subject of discussion than the ownership of a dead man's sperm, BID or facial transplants. We do (or ought to) have priorities in what we spend our time doing. And in my view poverty, malarial swamps, universal health care, hunger, poor education, exploitation of the "developing world" using children to work and produce inexpensive matting for our patio are far more important subjects. "People live lives of quiet desperation" is, I think, true enough.

Brecht in his three penny opera put it, I think, quite right: "Erst kommt das Fressen, dann kommt die Moral"--first comes a full stomach, then comes ethics.

2 Comments:

At Thursday, December 01, 2005 12:24:00 PM, Blogger Bardiac said...

I think Loewy makes a good point, though the same might be said of many intellectual/ scientific/ cultural pursuits: if it doesn't feed or clothe people (or provide a similar, vital service), is it worth spending resources on?

At some point, societies decide that it's worth spending resources on other things, of course.

It's not uncommon that I see articles talking about the rationing of health care in the UK or Canada which fail to recognize that health care is rationed in the US by ability to pay or acquire health insurance that will pay.

From what I've read about this surgery so far, it seems to be in line with reconstructive surgeries in trying to help someone resume "normal" function. But Loewys's point is that medical research funded for pretty basic functional reasons often gets pushed into iffy territory by big money.

He uses problematic BID surgery as an example (as an extreme example, perhaps, of plastic surgery).

Would various infertility treatments also count as an example? Should insurance cover infertility treatments? (Questions about infertility treatments also raises others about the lack of contraceptive coverage in many insurance programs, compared with the availability of ED coverage. How does gender fit in here, as well as money?)

 
At Thursday, December 01, 2005 7:01:00 PM, Blogger Maurice Bernstein, M.D. said...

Bardiac, excellent questions. The answers?

Politics and "big money": can society live without them? On the other hand can society remain just and ethical with them? ..Maurice.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home