Bioethics Discussion Blog: Do You Want to be Autopsied?

REMINDER: I AM POSTING A NEW TOPIC ABOUT ONCE A WEEK OR PERHAPS TWICE A WEEK. HOWEVER, IF YOU DON'T FIND A NEW TOPIC POSTED, THERE ARE AS OF MARCH 2013 OVER 900 TOPIC THREADS TO WHICH YOU CAN READ AND WRITE COMMENTS. I WILL BE AWARE OF EACH COMMENTARY AND MAY COME BACK WITH A REPLY.

TO FIND A TOPIC OF INTEREST TO YOU ON THIS BLOG, SIMPLY TYPE IN THE NAME OR WORDS RELATED TO THE TOPIC IN THE FIELD IN THE LEFT HAND SIDE AT TOP OF THE PAGE AND THEN CLICK ON “SEARCH BLOG”. WITH WELL OVER 900 TOPICS, MOST ABOUT GENERAL OR SPECIFIC ETHICAL ISSUES BUT NOT NECESSARILY RELATED TO ANY SPECIFIC DATE OR EVENT, YOU SHOULD BE ABLE TO FIND WHAT YOU WANT. IF YOU DON’T PLEASE WRITE TO ME ON THE FEEDBACK THREAD OR BY E-MAIL DoktorMo@aol.com

IMPORTANT REQUEST TO ALL WHO COMMENT ON THIS BLOG: ALL COMMENTERS WHO WISH TO SIGN ON AS ANONYMOUS NEVERTHELESS PLEASE SIGN OFF AT THE END OF YOUR COMMENTS WITH A CONSISTENT PSEUDONYM NAME OR SOME INITIALS TO HELP MAINTAIN CONTINUITY AND NOT REQUIRE RESPONDERS TO LOOK UP THE DATE AND TIME OF THE POSTING TO DEFINE WHICH ANONYMOUS SAID WHAT. Thanks. ..Maurice

FEEDBACK,FEEDBACK,FEEDBACK! WRITE YOUR FEEDBACK ABOUT THIS BLOG, WHAT IS GOOD, POOR AND CONSTRUCTIVE SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT TO THIS FEEDBACK THREAD

Saturday, June 02, 2012

Do You Want to be Autopsied?



Routine hospital autopsies, performed by pathologists, in the past was a not an uncommon result after a patent died in the hospital.  Families were routinely asked for permission for the autopsy.  In recent years, routine autopsies far less frequent.  According to a recent report by the CDC (United State Center for Disease Control) written by  Donna L. Hoyert the key findings were as follows:

  • The percentage of deaths for which an autopsy was performed declined more than 50 percent from 1972 through 2007, from 19.3 percent to 8.5 percent.
  • External causes accounted for 9 of the 10 most frequently autopsied causes of death.
  • The percentage autopsied declined with age after ages 15–24: from 60 percent at 15–24, to 11 percent at 55–64, to less than 5 percent at 65–74.
  • In 1972, 79 percent of autopsies were performed for deaths due to disease conditions and 19 percent for deaths due to external causes. By 2007, the respective percentages were 46 percent and 50 percent.
  • While the age distribution of deaths shifted to older ages from 1972 through 2007, autopsied deaths were increasingly concentrated in the age groups 1–34 and 35–64.
An autopsy, the medical examination of a deceased person, may confirm clinical findings, provide more complete information to describe cause of death, or uncover conditions not recognized clinically prior to death (1). Two types are performed in the United States: a) hospital or clinical autopsies, which family or physicians request to clarify cause of death or assess care, and b) medicolegal autopsies, which legal officials order to further investigate the circumstances surrounding a death (2). The autopsy rate, or percentage of deaths that received this final assessment, was stable from the 1950s until the beginning of the 1970s, when the autopsy rate began to decrease (3). This report uses mortality data from the National Vital Statistics System (NVSS) over a 35-year period to examine changes in the autopsy rate and in the distribution of those autopsied by age and cause. Variation in autopsy patterns has implications for which deaths may have a more complete and conclusive cause-of-death determination.
Read the full study.  To answer the question, why are autopsies not as popular now as it had been in th past, George Lundberg, M.D. writing in KevinMD suggest the following from the view of each participant except, of course, the deceased patient:
  1. Pathologists don’t like autopsies because they can be unpleasant, smelly, time-consuming, unappreciated, often not specifically paid for, and they take time away from other tasks viewed as more important, appreciated, pleasant, and lucrative.
  2. Clinicians do not like autopsies because it is uncomfortable to face a family that has lost a loved one. The physician must confront a level of failure because of the death, a tarnishing of the doctor-as-god image. Autopsy surprises might lead to an unhappy family, quality assurance committee concerns, possible litigation, and even a report to the state medical board.
  3. Hospital administrators do not like autopsies because they prefer not to dwell on unfavorable results of hospitalization. They claim difficulty finding the money to pay for them and can never make a profit from autopsies. They often have little medical or scientific background that would encourage curiosity and they tend to do mostly what licensing and accrediting agencies require; these remain strangely silent.
  4. Third-party payers do not like autopsies because they are an expense, and are performed on people who are already dead.
  5. Families of patients do not like autopsies because they are ill-informed about their value, afraid that it might cost them money, and some feel that the deceased person has already been through too much of an ordeal in dying.
The value of any professionally carried out autopsy might reveal not only some unexpected or unknown cause of death but also could provide the medical profession and future generations with knowledge of disease never previously described. In these days of modern technology from MRIs to genetic analysis, there is always room for the old fashioned but information-yielding autopsies. Permitting  an autopsy could be looked upon as a altruistic action for the future living even though, unfortunately, the patients themselves will no longer be benefited. 

So  the question for this thread: "Do you want to be autopsied?" And the answer is:____________. 
(You might also explain your answer.)  ..Maurice.


Graphic: From Wikimedia Commons: "The Anatomy Lesson of Dr. Nicolaes Tulp"  Rembrandt, 1632

8 Comments:

At Sunday, June 03, 2012 3:54:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Well it is sort of an unpleasant thought, so I guess I would prefer not. However, if there was some question of whether I got the proper care, and a medical mistake might be discovered, then yes.
TAM

 
At Sunday, June 03, 2012 11:36:00 AM, Blogger Maurice Bernstein, M.D. said...

TAM, Unpleasant thought? Would an autopsy would provoke a less pleasant thought than the thought of the incineration of cremation? And for you, the autopsy must be only for medico-legal reasons? Nothing further? ..Maurice.

 
At Sunday, June 03, 2012 11:50:00 AM, Anonymous StayingFit said...

I have to agree with TAM that the thought of being autopsied is unpleasant. But, as an organ donor, I fully expect to have pieces of me removed prior to burial. Neither the removal of my organs, nor being buried, are particularly happy thoughts, either. For that matter, neither is being dead!

Honestly, I would rather not think about any of it. But, I do take comfort in the fact that, being dead, none of it will bother me, when it occurs.

 
At Sunday, June 03, 2012 6:22:00 PM, Blogger Hexanchus said...

NO

It's essentially locking the barn door after the horse is out.

It would be interesting to know what percentage of autopsies find something useful to the patient's relatives or descendents, but I suspect it is very small and barring some specific triggering condition, not worth the expense.

Further, many insurance companies will not pay for them unless there is a compelling reason & the patient's family winds up stuck with the bill.

 
At Sunday, June 03, 2012 6:29:00 PM, Blogger Maurice Bernstein, M.D. said...

Hexanchus, but maybe this might be the best way to develop if not a better barn door itself, at least a better barn door locking system. ..Maurice.

 
At Monday, June 04, 2012 5:13:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hmm.. well I'm not sure I can explain why, but while I'm perfectly fine with being an organ donor, an autopsy just still isn't a plesant thought. I guess with organ donation, I know it is benefitting someone. And it seems more like a surgery (maybe I'm wrong there). Cremation is all at once, the body is entire. An autopsy really slits you open stem to stern. Just feels worse, emotionally, not logically.
I do not have siblings or children, so medico-legal reasons are all I can think of - if a serious mistake was made, and exposed by my autopsy, that might protect the living from further such mistakes. If I had children or someone who would benefit, then it would be ok with me, but I don't.
TAM

 
At Wednesday, June 06, 2012 12:30:00 PM, Anonymous María said...

No way!!! But there are autopsies and autopsies. I would dread the part of the procedure in which a serrated knife is used on the skull to get to the brain. Never. Like many things in the medical world, once you give them a pass they do anything they want, whether it's really necessary or not. Over here, a coroner's autopsy of a teenage girl that was shot by an ex-boyfriend did little or nothing to build a case.
It might come accompaned by an array of other tests that have nothing to do with wht is being investigated.
Besides it's butchery, really.

 
At Wednesday, June 06, 2012 1:03:00 PM, Blogger Maurice Bernstein, M.D. said...

Maria, "butchery", really?? Since the definition of butchery in Merriam-Webster dictionary is "1. Chiefly British: Slaughterhouse.
2. The preparation of meat for sale.
3. Cruel and ruthless slaughter of human beings.
4. Botch (As a verb- botch means: to foul up hopelessly.)

With regard to "butchery", I don't see any relationship of a professional autopsy to definitions 1, 2 or 3. And even 4, mistakes during the procedure may occur, it is only human, but all the ones I have attended and witnessed, there was only strict professional behavior and of course no human was slaughtered since the patient was already deceased.

Nevertheless, Maria, I am certain you are not alone in your description of an autopsy. ..Maurice.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home