Bioethics Discussion Blog: Telling the Truth the “Wrong Way”

REMINDER: I AM POSTING A NEW TOPIC ABOUT ONCE A WEEK OR PERHAPS TWICE A WEEK. HOWEVER, IF YOU DON'T FIND A NEW TOPIC POSTED, THERE ARE AS OF MARCH 2013 OVER 900 TOPIC THREADS TO WHICH YOU CAN READ AND WRITE COMMENTS. I WILL BE AWARE OF EACH COMMENTARY AND MAY COME BACK WITH A REPLY.

TO FIND A TOPIC OF INTEREST TO YOU ON THIS BLOG, SIMPLY TYPE IN THE NAME OR WORDS RELATED TO THE TOPIC IN THE FIELD IN THE LEFT HAND SIDE AT TOP OF THE PAGE AND THEN CLICK ON “SEARCH BLOG”. WITH WELL OVER 900 TOPICS, MOST ABOUT GENERAL OR SPECIFIC ETHICAL ISSUES BUT NOT NECESSARILY RELATED TO ANY SPECIFIC DATE OR EVENT, YOU SHOULD BE ABLE TO FIND WHAT YOU WANT. IF YOU DON’T PLEASE WRITE TO ME ON THE FEEDBACK THREAD OR BY E-MAIL DoktorMo@aol.com

IMPORTANT REQUEST TO ALL WHO COMMENT ON THIS BLOG: ALL COMMENTERS WHO WISH TO SIGN ON AS ANONYMOUS NEVERTHELESS PLEASE SIGN OFF AT THE END OF YOUR COMMENTS WITH A CONSISTENT PSEUDONYM NAME OR SOME INITIALS TO HELP MAINTAIN CONTINUITY AND NOT REQUIRE RESPONDERS TO LOOK UP THE DATE AND TIME OF THE POSTING TO DEFINE WHICH ANONYMOUS SAID WHAT. Thanks. ..Maurice

FEEDBACK,FEEDBACK,FEEDBACK! WRITE YOUR FEEDBACK ABOUT THIS BLOG, WHAT IS GOOD, POOR AND CONSTRUCTIVE SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT TO THIS FEEDBACK THREAD

Wednesday, August 24, 2005

Telling the Truth the “Wrong Way”

The issue is whether a physician loses the right of free speech because he is a physician. Can the speech presenting realistic clinical information to a patient be found to be of the same harm as crying out “fire” as a prank in a filled theater? Or is there a limitation to speech because it may be contrary to professional standards?

The case, as published in the New Hampshire Union Leader is regarding the action of the New Hampshire Board of Medicine versus Dr. Terry Bennett and raises these questions. A year ago, a patient whom Dr. Bennett had been following for her obesity and who had developed complications of her weight disorder took offense at his “obesity lecture” and filed a complaint with the Board of Medicine.

“The State Law state law authorizes the board to take disciplinary action against physicians who engage in providing false information, practicing medicine while impaired, behavior that is incompatible with basic knowledge and competence, dishonest or unprofessional conduct, negligence, allowing an unlicensed person to practice in the physician's office, failing to provide aseptic safeguards, dishonest advertising or statements, willfully violating the Medical Practice Act or if convicted of a felony.” My understanding is that this authorization represents the usual standard criteria for disciplinary action. The complaint was not dismissed and is being investigated by the Attorney General’s office with a public hearing to be scheduled.

How and to what degree a physician expresses valid information to a patient with the intent to benefit the patient is an open question and depends on the personality, knowledge and motivation of both the physician and patient. It is my opinion that the penalty to the doctor for the consequences of telling the truth the “wrong way” should be the loss of a patient since the patient has the right to leave the physician’s care and go to another doctor. Prosecution of the physician for the results of this type of speech is wrong. ..Maurice.

1 Comments:

At Friday, September 02, 2005 10:27:00 PM, Anonymous Silvienne said...

The patient who took such offence at his doctor's well-meaning remarks about his obesity wasted the time of the court and everyone else concerned by filing his frivilous lawsuit against the doctor. He had the option to choose another doctor anytime he wanted to and should have done just that, without attempting to penalize his doctor.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home