"Commercial Surrogacy": Women'$ Bodie$ as Container$
The title of this blog thread " 'Commercial Surrogacy': Women's Bodies as Containers" with the plural expressed with dollar signs may be a bit over descriptive but yet it emphasizes a commerce present today which is utilizing local women or bringing foreigners into the United States and elsewhere to directly participate in the pregnancy and delivery another family's genetic child. The question is whether this is a fair utilization and commercialization of a woman and her body and whether, after delivery and she is no longer a container for the pregnancy, she should be allowed to maintain some relationship to the child and the child's family.
This topic is, I think, very nicely described, in a paper by a PhD student Hannah Giunta on the Michigan State University Bioethics website. The ethical and humanistic point which is stressed by Ms Giunta is "Commercial surrogacy arrangements where prospective parents possibly supply the raw ingredients, sign a contract, and return for pick-up with the intention never to see the surrogate again require women to do fundamentally relational work without relational support or respect. Effectively, couples are saying,'You’re good enough to carry our child but not welcome as part of our family.' It’s this attitude that is unacceptable."
What I would like to see discussed here on this blog thread is both the ethical good or bad of this form of commerce but also Ms Giunta's concern that if such use of women and their bodies is socially and legally acceptable whether something more should be offered to these women: acceptance into the newly born child's family as a family member. ..Maurice.
Graphic: From Google Images modified with ArtRage and Picasa3..
posted by Maurice Bernstein, M.D. @ 8:59:00 AM
3 comments
3 Comments:
I couldn't have put it better myself.
There's a reason why it's illegal in
most of the world and it should!
The following is not intended as an advertisement or commercial presentation for a specific surrogacy company but only as a resource so that my readers can access the information that these deliver to the prospective surrogates.
An example company:
www.circlesurrogacy.com
..Maurice.
It seems to me that the reasoning of this argument is that the process is demeaning to the surrogate. If she is OK with providing this "service" for a fee - who are we to judge? It seems like a symbiotic relationship. There may be other arguments against the process, but this one is pretty weak in my mind. I would think that if a woman finds the thought of being a surrogate demeaning she wouldn't do it.
Post a Comment
<< Home