Medical Ethics of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (2)
An issue which can be raised regarding complementary and alternative medicine is whether the physician’s advice to patients encouraging use of the modalities involved and their use is indeed ethical. Adams, Cohen, Eisenberg and Jonsen writing in the Annals of Internal Medicine present some criteria which if considered may pave the way to ethical use in appropriate patients. The following is the abstract from the Annals article. ..Maurice.
From the Annals of Internal Medicine, 15 October 2002 | Volume 137 Issue 8 | Pages 660-664
Ethical Considerations of Complementary and Alternative Medical Therapies in Conventional Medical Settings
Karen E. Adams, MD; Michael H. Cohen, JD, MBA, MFA; David Eisenberg, MD; and Albert R. Jonsen, PhD
Increasing use of complementary and alternative medical (CAM) therapies by patients, health care providers, and institutions has made it imperative that physicians consider their ethical obligations when recommending, tolerating, or proscribing these therapies. The authors present a risk–benefit framework that can be applied to determine the appropriateness of using CAM therapies in various clinical scenarios. The major relevant issues are the severity and acuteness of illness; the curability of the illness by conventional forms of treatment; the degree of invasiveness, associated toxicities, and side effects of the conventional treatment; the availability and quality of evidence of utility and safety of the desired CAM treatment; the level of understanding of risks and benefits of the CAM treatment combined with the patient’s knowing and voluntary acceptance of those risks; and the patient’s persistence of intention to use CAM therapies. Even in the absence of scientific evidence for CAM therapies, by considering these relevant issues, providers can formulate a plan that is clinically sound, ethically appropriate, and targeted to the unique circumstances of individual patients. Physicians are encouraged to remain engaged in problem-solving with their patients and to attempt to elucidate and clarify the patient’s core values and beliefs when counseling about CAM therapies.
3 Comments:
I am currently working on a second MSN and my assigment was to research some particularily bad cancer treatment claims. I found the work of Dr. Hulda Clark to be particularily disconcerting. It raised a question in my mind about how to be both a patient advocate and a voice of reason when a patient suggested a perfectly outrageous treatment. You model gave me some insight in to the solution of the problem, Thanks.
Julia Potts, MSN
Yantis, Texas
Hi Julia;
Would you mind give me your mail address? I have some questions for you.
Thanks
Nicole Parson
Fort Worth, TX
Perhaps it would be better if each party send their e-mail address to me, DoktorMo@aol.com to facilitate further communication between Nichole and Julia rather than posting it here. Also, Nichole, perhaps you want to write the question that you desire here to enable others to enter into the discussion. ..Maurice.
Post a Comment
<< Home